06IA
Airport
Rich Field
Walford, Iowa

FAA NFDC Information Effective 56-day cycle 04/03/2014 - 5/29/2014

Ops Comms Services Owner Runways IFR Procs Current NOTAMs Remarks

Location

FAA Identifier:06IA (Zero-Six-India-Alpha)
Lat/Lng: 41.8413944444, -91.8343444444
41-50-29.0200N, 091-50-03.6400W
Estimated
Elevation: 880 feet Estimated
Magnetic Variation: 01E, (2000), [0W (2014)]
Sectional: CHICAGO
From City: 2nm N of Walford

Operations

Use: Private
Airspace Analysis: CONDITIONAL
Provided a Clear Approach to Each Runway for a 20:1 Glide Slope & a Clear Transitional Surface for a 7:1 Slope.
Ownership: Privately owned
Activation: 12/2000
Control Tower: no
ARTCC: Chicago Center (ZAU)
FSS: Fort Dodge FSS (FOD)
Wind Indicator: Unlighted
Landing Fee: no

Communications

Services

Based Aircraft

Single Engine GA: 1
Total: 1

Annual Operations

For year ending: 03/15/2000
Total: 0

Ownership

Owner: Walter M. Rich
1149 Johnson Iowa Rd NW
Amana, Ia 52203
319-721-2437
Manager: Walter M. Rich
1149 Johnson Iowa Rd NW
Amana, Ia 52203
319-721-2437

Runways

Runways: 09/27

Runway 09/27

Length: 1750 feet
Width: 100 feet
Surface: Grass / Sod
End 09 End 27
Runway Markings: Runway 09/27 Marked by Cones.  
Objects affecting Navigable Airspace (CFR part 77): Utility runway with a visual approach Utility runway with a visual approach

Procedures

NOTAMs

Additional Remarks


This information is current as of the date at the top of the page. These pages are valid for all US airports, based on information from FAA National Flight Data Center. Weather information is provided based on AvnWx Data Sources. NOTAM information is from FAA's NAIMES data portal.

As with most information on this website, this page is generated based on FAA data, with automatic translations done via computer. You can also directly read the A/FD via the green icon link at the top of the page, which is the FAA text, and sometimes provides a different translation of codes. Please email me (using link at top-right of this page) if you see information which is confusing, misleading, or wrong....Or have suggestions for additions/changes.

Comments from the user community are clearly noted as such this page, are for informational purposes only, may be wrong and/or out-of-date, and must not be used as a sole source for critical decision making. See Privacy Policy and Conditions of Use.