| 5MN0
Airport
|
Scrabeck
|
|
High Forest, Minnesota
|
|
|
|
FAA NFDC Information Effective 56-day cycle 05/02/2013 - 6/27/2013
| FAA Identifier: | 5MN0 (Five-Mike-November-Zero) |
| Lat/Lng: |
43.86665, -92.5610638889
43-51-59.9400N, 092-33-39.8300W
Estimated by OWNER on 12/08/2003
|
| Elevation: |
1280 feet
Estimated
by NGS
|
| Magnetic Variation: |
[0W (2013)]
|
| Sectional: |
CHICAGO
|
| From City: |
2nm
NW of High Forest
|
| Use: |
Private
|
| Airspace Analysis: |
CONDITIONAL
Provided Clear 20:1 Slope, Clear Obstl Free Zone, and Clear Runway Safety Area.
|
| Ownership: |
Privately owned
|
| Activation: |
07/2004
|
| Control Tower: |
no
|
| ARTCC: |
Minneapolis Center
(ZMP)
|
| FSS: |
Princeton FSS
(PNM)
|
| Wind Indicator: |
Unlighted
|
| Landing Fee: |
no
|
| Single Engine GA: |
1
|
| Total: |
1
|
|
|
| Owner: |
Trevor Scrabeck
10791 60Th Ave SW
Stewartville, Mn 55976
507-533-4913
|
| Manager: |
Trevor Scrabeck
10791 60Th Ave SW
Stewartville, Mn 55976
507-533-4913
|
|
Runway 11/29
| Length: |
1400 feet
|
| Width: |
50 feet
|
| Surface: |
Grass / Sod
|
|
End 11 |
End 29 |
| Right Hand Pattern: |
Yes
|
|
| Objects: |
|
Trees
|
| Objects affecting Navigable Airspace (CFR part 77): |
Utility runway with a visual approach
|
Utility runway with a visual approach
|
| Object Height: |
|
30' AGL
|
| Object Distance: |
|
100' Along centerline
|
| • | All Traffic Remain S of Runway. |
This information is current as of the date at the top of the page. These
pages are valid for all US airports, based on information from FAA National Flight Data Center.
Weather information
is provided based on AvnWx Data Sources. NOTAM information
is from FAA's NAIMES data portal.
As with most information on this website, this page is generated based on FAA data, with
automatic translations done via computer. You can also directly read the A/FD via
the green icon link at the top of the page, which is the FAA text, and
sometimes provides a different translation of codes. Please email
me (using link at top-right of this page) if you see information which is confusing,
misleading, or wrong....Or have suggestions for additions/changes.
Comments from the user community are clearly noted as such this page, are for informational purposes only, may
be wrong and/or out-of-date, and must not be used as a sole source
for critical decision making. See Privacy Policy and
Conditions of Use.