Roxbury, Maine

FAA NFDC Information Effective 56-day cycle 08/20/2015 - 10/15/2015

Ops Comms Services Owner Runways IFR Procs Current NOTAMs Remarks


FAA Identifier:ME17 (Mike-Echo-One-Seven)
Lat/Lng: 44.6602333333, -70.588
44-39-36.8400N, 070-35-16.8000W
Estimated by OWNER on 03/16/2005
Elevation: 670 feet Estimated by OWNER on 03/16/2005
Magnetic Variation: [-16W (2015)]
Sectional: NEW YORK
From City: 1nm S of Roxbury


Use: Private
Airspace Analysis: CONDITIONAL
Provided You Resolve Traffic Pattern Conflicts with Arpts Within 5Nm; VFR Operations; Install a Stop Sign on Each End of the Driveway.
Ownership: Privately owned
Activation: 05/2005
Control Tower: no
ARTCC: Boston Center (ZBW)
FSS: Bangor FSS (BGR)
Wind Indicator: Lighted
Landing Fee: no



Based Aircraft

Single Engine GA: 2
Total: 2

Annual Operations

For year ending: 06/01/2004
Total: 0


Owner: Douten & Donna Thomas
1684 Roxbury Road
Roxbury, Me 04275
Manager: Douten & Donna Thomas
1684 Roxbury Road
Roxbury, Me 04275


Runways: 01/19

Runway 01/19

Length: 1800 feet
by Owner on 03/16/2005
Width: 75 feet
Surface: Grass / Sod
End 01 End 19
Objects: Trees Trees
Objects affecting Navigable Airspace (CFR part 77): Utility runway with a visual approach Utility runway with a visual approach
Object Height: 20' AGL 50' AGL
Object Distance: 400' Along centerline 800' Along centerline



Additional Remarks

This information is current as of the date at the top of the page. These pages are valid for all US airports, based on information from FAA National Flight Data Center. Weather information is provided based on AvnWx Data Sources. NOTAM information is from FAA's NAIMES data portal.

As with most information on this website, this page is generated based on FAA data, with automatic translations done via computer. You can also directly read the A/FD via the green icon link at the top of the page, which is the FAA text, and sometimes provides a different translation of codes. Please email me (using link at top-right of this page) if you see information which is confusing, misleading, or wrong....Or have suggestions for additions/changes.

Comments from the user community are clearly noted as such this page, are for informational purposes only, may be wrong and/or out-of-date, and must not be used as a sole source for critical decision making. See Privacy Policy and Conditions of Use.